MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377007445 · doi:10.30790/mnyj/2023/57

Magam vagy magamat?

2023· article· hu· W4377007445 on OpenAlexaff
György Rákosi

Bibliographic record

VenueMagyar Nyelvjárások · 2023
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÁKOSI GYÖRGY spellout of accusative morphology correlates with referential uses of the reflexive.The emerging picture is that the use of accusative morphology on these reflexives has been on the decline since the old Hungarian period, and it is a marked option in the synchronic state of the language, where speakers tend to avoid overt case morphology when the reflexives is interpreted as a bound variable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagyar NyelvjárásokSame topicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationFrench-language works237,207