MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4377013647 · doi:10.2196/preprints.49103

IRONMAN® Hawaii is the fastest race course for age group triathletes (Preprint)

2023· preprint· en· W4377013647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beat Knechtle, David Valero, Elias Villiger, Mabliny Thuany, Pantelis Τ. Nikolaidis, Ivan Čuk, Marília Santos Andrade, Pedro Forte, Katja Weiss

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesDemographyGeographyMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND The IRONMAN® triathlon is a popular multi-sport, where age group athletes often strive to qualify for the IRONMAN® World Championship in Hawaii. The aim of the present study was to investigate the location of the fastest IRONMAN® racecourses for age group triathletes. This knowledge will help IRONMAN® age group triathletes find the best racecourse, considering their strengths and weaknesses, to qualify. OBJECTIVE To determine the fastest IRONMAN® racecourse for age group triathletes using the machine learning XG Boost algorithm. METHODS We collected and analyzed 677,702 age group finishers' records from 228 countries participating in the IRONMAN® competitions held between 2002 and 2022 across 67 event locations. A predictive model was built with the race finish time as the predicted variable and the triathlete’s gender, age group, country of origin, and event location as predictors. The model was trained with 75% of the available data and was validated against the remaining 25%. Several model interpretability tools were used to explore how each predictor contributed to the model's predictive power, from which we intended to infer whether one or more predictors were more important than the others. RESULTS The XG Boost Regressor model analysis indicated that the IRONMAN® Hawaii course was the fastest racecourse and that male athletes aged 35 years and younger were the fastest. Most of the finishers were competing in IRONMAN® triathlons held in the USA, such as IRONMAN® Wisconsin, Florida, Lake Placid, Arizona, and Hawaii, where the IRONMAN® World Championship takes place. Still, the fastest average times were achieved in IRONMAN® Hawaii, Austria, Copenhagen, Brazil Florianopolis, and Barcelona. Most of the successful IRONMAN® finishers originated from the United States of America, followed by athletes from the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Germany, and France. The best mean IRONMAN® race times were achieved by athletes from Austria, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Finland, and Denmark. CONCLUSIONS Age group athletes who have better placements in faster events and intend to qualify for IRONMAN® Hawaii may participate in IRONMAN® Austria, Copenhagen, Brazil Florianopolis, and Barcelona in order to achieve a fast race time to qualify for the IRONMAN® World Championship in Hawaii. CLINICALTRIAL -

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSports Performance and Training→French-language works237,207→