MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377022317 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2022-0243

Massively parallel fragment-based quantum chemistry for large molecular systems: the <scp>serestipy</scp> software

2023· article· en· W4377022317 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patrick Eschenbach, Niklas Niemeyer, Johannes Neugebauer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDensity functional theoryQuantum chemistryMassively parallelPython (programming language)Excited stateSoftwareComputational scienceQuantumEmbeddingComputational chemistryComputer scienceMoleculeParallel computingQuantum mechanicsSupramolecular chemistryOrganic chemistryProgramming languagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the Serestipy software as an add-on to the quantum-chemistry program Serenity. Serestipy is a representational-state transfer-oriented application programming interface written in the Python programming language enabling parallel subsystem density-functional theory calculations. We introduce approximate strategies in the context of frozen-density embedding time-dependent density-functional theory to make parallel large-scale excited-state calculations feasible. Their accuracy is carefully benchmarked with calculations for a model system consisting of porphine rings. We apply this framework to a nanotube made up of those porphine rings consisting of 12 160 atoms (or 264 960 basis functions) and obtain its electronic structure and absorption spectrum in less than a day of computational time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207