MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4377027585 · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.540957

Effects of ketamine on frontoparietal interactions during working memory in macaque monkeys

2023· preprint· en· W4377027585 on OpenAlexaff
Liya Ma, Nupur Katyare, Kevin Johnston, Stefan Everling

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorking memoryNeuroscienceMacaqueNMDA receptorPsychologyPosterior parietal cortexSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)KetamineCognitionParietal lobePrefrontal cortexMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Schizophrenia is known as a syndrome of dysconnection among brain regions. As a model for this syndrome, low doses of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, such as ketamine, produce schizophrenia-like symptoms and cognitive deficits in healthy humans and animals. One of such deficits is impaired working memory, a process that engages an extended network of both frontal and parietal areas. While ketamine is known to disrupt working memory by altering both spiking and oscillatory activities in the lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC), it remains unknown whether NMDA receptor antagonists also produce frontoparietal dysconnection during working memory processes. Here, we simultaneously recorded both single unit activities and local field potentials from lPFC and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in macaque monkeys during a rule-based working memory task. Like previous work in the lPFC alone, we found that ketamine compromised delay-period rule coding in single neurons and reduced low-frequency oscillations in the PPC. Furthermore, ketamine reduced task-related connectivity in both fronto-parietal and parieto-frontal directions. Consistent with this, ketamine also weakened interareal coherence between spiking and low-frequency oscillatory activities. Our findings demonstrate the utility of acute NMDA receptor antagonist in simulating a syndrome of dysconnection and support this model in its potential for the exploration of novel treatment strategies for schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→