MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377029601 · doi:10.1002/adom.202300302

Ion Migration as a New Paradigm to Boost Self‐Driven Perovskite Narrowband Photodetectors

2023· article· en· W4377029601 on OpenAlexaff
Shanshan Yu, Yu Li, Jian Wang, Kai Zhang, Zedong Lin, Wei Qian, Ziqi Deng, Fumin Guo, Ming‐De Li, Lionel Vayssières, Makhsud I. Saidaminov, David Lee Phillips, Shihe Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersShenzhen Peacock PlanNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaShenzhen Government
KeywordsPhotodetectorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsNarrowbandResponsivityPerovskite (structure)IonCharge carrierPassivationLayer (electronics)OpticsNanotechnologyPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Halide perovskite narrowband photodetectors based on a charge collection narrowing mechanism have emerged as a new class of optoelectronic devices for monochromatic imaging. However, improving the figures‐of‐merit of such narrowband photodetectors remains challenging due to the inability to manipulate the major material players in the elusive photoresponse process. Here, a novel approach of manipulating ion migration to enhance the narrowband photoresponse of self‐driven p‐i‐n type photodetectors is taken by intentionally adding mobile ions into the formamidine and methylamine mixed cation perovskite layer. The excess mobile ions reduce the activation energy of ion migration, and this facilitated migration orchestrates the ions in the perovskite layer to re‐engineer the energy band, and thus modulates the charge separation and collection energetics and kinetics, leading to an unprecedented boost of the narrowband photoresponse. The photodetector based on this approach achieved a peak responsivity of as high as 112.41 mA W−1 at 820 nm at zero bias with a full‐width at half maximum of only 22 nm and an over 3‐fold improvement in the spectral rejection ratio, making it highly promising for the next‐generation color imaging devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207