Hipoxia e hipersensibilidad de tipo IV: patogenia dual en reacciones a implantes de cadera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen Antecedentes Las reacciones tisulares adversas (RTAs) a implantes de cadera afectan a una alta proporción de pacientes. Si bien fueron inicialmente descritas en articulaciones de metal sobre metal, un creciente número de estudios señala su presencia en otros tipos de implante. El gran número de pacientes con prótesis de cadera en el mundo señala la urgencia de comprender cabalmente los mecanismos que dan origen a RTAs para el desarrollo de alternativas de monitoreo, diagnóstico y terapéuticas eficientes. Ámbito de revisión y público objetivo En la siguiente revisión bibliográfica, abarcamos desde la corrosión y el desgaste de los materiales utilizados en implantes de cadera hasta los mecanismos celulares e inmunológicos involucrados, con el fin de ofrecer una visión actualizada de antecedentes clínicos y científicos a estudiantes, cirujanos ortopédicos e investigadores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".