MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377083811 · doi:10.7202/1099182ar

Altérités poétiques d’un récit de vie. Parabole du failli de Lyonel Trouillot

2023· article· fr· W4377083811 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Françoise Cévaër

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes françaises · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans Parabole du failli (2013), Lyonel Trouillot rend hommage au célèbre comédien haïtien Karl Marcel Casséus, disparu en 1997. Dans ce récit qui concilie trois genres (le roman, la notice nécrologique et la poésie), l’auteur tente de circonscrire l’énigme de la vie de Pedro, personnage principal de la fiction, un comédien connu écrivant des poèmes en secret. Trois écritures conversent et se complètent pour raconter une même histoire, toutes assorties d’un discours métafictionnel interrogeant les choix d’écritures au sein de l’entreprise biographique ainsi que la part et les effets possibles de chacune d’entre elles dans la figuration d’un individu, l’historicisation d’une expérience et la fictionnalisation d’une vie. Au-delà du portrait empirique de l’artiste et du récit de la vie de Pedro, ce qui advient dans Parabole du failli c’est l’aventure poétique elle-même comme objet essentiel d’une entreprise biographique totale où se croisent le destin d’un poète et celui d’un roman, où s’entrelacent la trajectoire d’une existence et le parcours d’une écriture, tous subsumés par la poésie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes françaisesSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207