Rythmes de vie et attention en centre de vacances et de loisirs pendant les vacances d’été
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de la recherche est d’observer les rythmes de performances attentionnelles journalières et hebdomadaires en dehors des périodes scolaires dans des structures d’accueils collectives. Des épreuves de barrages de nombres sont proposées aux 162 enfants de 6 à 11 ans qui ont participé à cette étude. Il existe un profil attentionnel diffèrent selon l’âge des enfants et le mode d’accueil fréquenté. Si l’on considère le profil habituellement observé comme un fait positif, nous pouvons avancer que le centre de loisirs serait l’accueil le mieux adapté aux plus jeunes enfants tandis que le centre de vacances le serait davantage pour les plus grands. Le rythme classique étant retrouvé dans ces structures, ces dernières pourraient agir de manière positive sur les performances scolaires au retour en classe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".