MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease Using a Variational Mode Decomposition Based Deep-Learning

2023· article· en· W4377089525 on OpenAlexaff
Madan Parajuli, Amy W. Amara, Mohamed Shaban

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsDementiaCognitionElectroencephalographyParkinson's diseaseAudiologySleep architectureCognitive impairmentDiseaseMedicineArtificial intelligencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyComputer sciencePsychiatryInternal medicinePolysomnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease (PD) which is the second most common neurodegenerative disease in the United States is challenging for specialists to diagnose and grade. Prior to the onset of motor symptoms of PD, patients exhibit alteration in sleep architecture which plays a critical role in consolidating memory, a key cognitive process of the brain. Standard spectral and signal analysis techniques have been recently introduced to exploit the changes in the electroencephalography of sleep related to PD or its cognitive complications including dementia. However, the use of artificial intelligence for the automated detection of the progression of PD to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in sleep EEG have not yet been investigated. In this paper, we introduce a novel highly accurate variational mode decomposition based deep-learning framework applied on sleep electroencephalography signals in order to classify PD subjects into patients exhibiting normal cognition (NC) or MCI. The proposed framework is capable of detecting MCI at a significantly high 4-fold cross validation accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and quadratic weighted Kappa score of almost 99% offering a rapid and supportive tool for specialists to monitor the progression of PD and ensure the early initiation of efficient therapeutic treatments that will accordingly improve the quality of life for patients and their caregivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207