MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377090407 · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10543-8

An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on MAFLD and the risk of CVD

2023· article· en· W4377090407 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Zhou, Giovanni Targher, Christopher D. Byrne, Virend K. Somers, Seung Up Kim, C. Anwar A. Chahal, Vincent Wai‐Sun Wong, Jingjing Cai, Michael D. Shapiro, Mohammed Eslam, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Ki‐Chul Sung, Anoop Misra, Jian-Jun Li, Carlos Brotons, George Papatheodoridis, Aijun Sun, Yusuf Yılmaz, Wah‐Kheong Chan, Hui Huang, Nahúm Méndez‐Sánchez, Saleh A. Alqahtani, Helena Cortez‐Pinto, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Robert J. de Knegt, Ponsiano Ocama, Manuel Romero‐Gómez, Marat Fudim, Giada Sebastiani, Jang Won Son, John Ryan, Ignatios Ikonomidis, Sombat Treeprasertsuk, Daniele Pastori, Monica Lupșor‐Platon, Herbert Tilg, Hasmik Ghazinyan, Jérôme Boursier, Masahide Hamaguchi, Mindie H. Nguyen, Jian‐Gao Fan, George Boon‐Bee Goh, Mamun Al Mahtab, Saeed Hamid, Nilanka Perera, Jacob George, Ming‐Hua Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University Health CentreRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
FundersShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
KeywordsMedicineHepatologyStatement (logic)Colorectal surgeryMultidisciplinary approachMEDLINEPublic healthIntensive care medicineInternal medicineFamily medicineAbdominal surgeryPathologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.008
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0090.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations183
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHepatology InternationalSame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207