Optimization of Pre-Ictal Interval Time Period for Epileptic Seizure Prediction Using Temporal and Frequency Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures. Automated prediction of epileptic seizures is essential in monitoring the health of an epileptic individual to avoid cognitive problems, accidental injuries, and even fatality. In this study, scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings of epileptic individuals were used to predict seizures using a configurable Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning algorithm. Initially, the EEG data was preprocessed using a standard pipeline. We investigated 36 minutes before the onset of the seizure to classify between the pre-ictal and inter-ictal states. Further, temporal and frequency domain features were extracted from the different intervals of the pre-ictal and inter-ictal periods. Then, the XGBoost classification model was utilized to optimize the best interval for the pre-ictal state to predict the seizure by applying Leave one patient out cross-validation. Our results suggest that the proposed model could predict seizures 10.17 minutes before the onset. The highest classification accuracy achieved was 83.33 %. Thus, the suggested framework can be optimized further to select the best features and prediction interval for more accurate seizure forecasting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".