MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surface wave height distributions and rogue wave probabilities on two-layer fluids

2023· article· en· W4377093014 on OpenAlexafffund
Johannes Gemmrich, Tom Redhead, Adam H. Monahan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Fluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMarine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network
KeywordsPolarSurface waveHomogeneousGeologyRogue waveGeophysicsLayer (electronics)Significant wave heightSurface (topology)Surface layerSpectral lineSurface waterWind wavePhysicsOceanographyMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rogue waves are individual ocean surface waves much larger than the prevailing wave field. In high sea states they can be a danger to marine operations. Rogue waves are well studied for unstratified water. However, on a two-layer fluid the surface wave spectra are modified due to triad interactions with interfacial waves. Such triad interactions are not possible in homogeneous water. We find the modified surface spectrum reduces rogue waves. These findings are relevant for the changing polar oceans where prolonged ice melt is expected to facilitate open water with higher sea states while also creating a surface layer of freshwater overlaying salt water, as in our idealized model calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review FluidsSame topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207