MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377099604 · doi:10.1149/11106.0785ecst

Energy Transition Scenarios in Off-grid Communities using SOFC-CHP/Battery Hybrid Systems

2023· article· en· W4377099604 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Nousch, Marie-Lise Tremblay, Simon Besner, Guillaume Jeanmonod, Mathias Hartmann, Daniela Herold, Martin Simoneau, A. Michaelis

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityBattery (electricity)Automotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceWork (physics)Stand-alone power systemElectricity generationDiesel fuelWaste heatProcess engineeringHeat generationDistributed generationWaste managementPower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringRenewable energyMechanical engineeringHeat exchangerThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, off-grid communities rely mainly on diesel gensets with limited electrical efficiency and diesel furnaces for electricity and heat generation, respectively. The CO2 emissions associated with this electricity production can be reduced by improving the electrical efficiency of the system thus reducing the fuel consumption. Additionally, waste heat from the electricity production can be recovered for heating thus creating a combined heat and power system. In this work, a solid oxide fuel cell combined heat and power system hybridized to a battery was proposed for this purpose. Simulation of the annual electricity and heat production were performed using real temporal electrical demand data. Results showed that a reduction of up to 36 % in primary energy consumption can be reached compared with the current situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207