Aperiodic brain activity and response to anesthesia vary in disorders of consciousness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the human electroencephalogram (EEG), oscillatory power co-exist with non-oscillatory, aperiodic activity. Although EEG analysis has traditionally focused exclusively on oscillatory power, recent investigations have shown that the aperiodic EEG component can distinguish conscious wakefulness from sleep and anesthetic-induced unconsciousness. This study investigates the aperiodic EEG component of individuals in a disorder of consciousness (DOC); how it changes in response to exposure to anesthesia; and how it relates to the brain's information richness and criticality. High-density EEG was recorded from 43 individuals in a DOC, with 16 of these individuals undergoing a protocol of propofol anesthesia. The aperiodic component was defined by the spectral slope of the power spectral density. Our results demonstrate that the EEG aperiodic component is more informative about the participants' level of consciousness than the oscillatory component, especially for patients that suffered from a stroke. Importantly, the pharmacologically induced change in the spectral slope from 30 to 45 Hz positively correlated with individual's pre-anesthetic level of consciousness. The pharmacologically induced loss of information-richness and criticality was associated with individual's pre-anesthetic aperiodic component. During exposure to anesthesia, the aperiodic component distinguished individuals with DOC, according to their 3-month recovery status. The aperiodic EEG component has been historically neglected; this research highlights the necessity of considering this measure for the assessment of individuals in DOC and future research that seeks to understand the neurophysiological underpinnings of consciousness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".