Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims To investigate the effect of frailty education on the perception of frailty risk for urban and rural older adults.Methods Forty adults completed a frailty perception survey, the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), and participated in a 6-week frailty intervention program.Results Urban older adults increased knowledge of frailty including identification of frailty risk (.0035, p < .05), importance of good nutrition as we age (.0015, p < .05) and confidence in accessing community resources (.000031, p < .05). Aggregate site results showed increased accessibility to frailty education including risk of frailty (2.24576E-12, p < .05), frailty criteria (3.29825E-12, p < .05), and reduction of frailty risk (1.21856E-09, p < .05) for rural and urban older adults. Fall prevention knowledge improved at both Urban and Rural A sites (.00021, p < .05).Conclusions The frailty education provided to urban and rural community dwelling older adults supported a change in the perceptions of frailty risk after participation in the program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".