MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377203303 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2023.0005

The Search for the First Americans: Science, Power, Politics by Robert V. Davis

2023· article· en· W4377203303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Richard Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueGreat Plains research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsMythologyPower (physics)Economic JusticeEnvironmental ethicsHistorySociologyClassicsLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Search for the First Americans: Science, Power, Politics by Robert V. Davis G. Richard Scott The Search for the First Americans: Science, Power, Politics. By Robert V. Davis. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2021. ix + 145 pp. Notes, bibliography. $45.00 cloth. Davis, a nonspecialist in the field of First American studies, breaks his book into three parts: (1) First American Theories, Myths, and Evidence, (2) First American Science, and (3) Community. Each part includes several chapters that cover a range of topics from American Indian creation myths and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to how archaeologists, linguists, bioanthropologists, and geneticists address the issue of First Americans. On several occasions, Davis quotes Jim Adovasio, who says the basic problem is "who the hell are these people, where did they come from, and when did they get here" (ix). Davis adds that "Although much has been documented, science is no closer today to finding an answer than at any time since the arrival of Columbus. In short, it has been a failed endeavor" (ix). I have many colleagues who would take umbrage with such a pessimistic view of progress in the search for the First Americans. A short review cannot do justice to the strides made in this endeavor, and these strides are in every field Davis discusses, from archaeology and linguistics to dental anthropology and genetics. Perhaps Davis is thinking there should be a dramatic paradigm shift like plate tectonics in geology. The impact of genomics on this problem comes close and may reach that status at some point. Davis focuses attention on the Clovis culture, with special reference to Blackwater Draw in New Mexico, and how the technology of this culture with its distinctive lanceolate fluted points evolved to serve as the bellwether of First Americans. Following in the footsteps of Paul Martin and Vance Haynes, a Clovis-first position developed in the 1960s and hardened over several decades. I have known and worked with Clovis-first archaeologists, but they are not wedded to the "fact" that the Clovis tradition represented the earliest peoples in the Americas. They are "wedded" to the position of "show me the evidence." For many early claims of pre-Clovis, the evidence was questionable, and many sites were dismissed as pre-Clovis. In recent times, things have changed—there are now sites most agree are pre-Clovis, so the "Clovis police" is shrinking. Moreover, many scholars who thought First Americans arrived via the Bering Land Bridge and then traversed an ice-free corridor through Canada now acknowledge that a maritime route is likely given the late opening of the corridor. Granted, I am a First American scientist, but I appreciate the space Davis devotes to American Indian creation myths. Unfortunately, some pit these creation myths against science, but that is not a position with which I am familiar. Most of us in the field are anthropologists, so we understand the nature of creation myths. They are a cultural universal that meets a human need to know how everything was created, including specific groups of humans. They have no empirical basis and cannot be falsified, and none of us are in the business of doing that. As a nonspecialist, Davis does a good job summing up alternative viewpoints on the question of First Americans. His sections on history are useful and enlightening but his treatment of First American science is dated. He discusses mtDNA and Y chromosome variation, but these have been supplanted by genomic studies that analyze thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms. The human footprints found at White Sands in New Mexico that are older than 20,000 years were reported after the book was published. I mention this because it adds another notch in the pre-Clovis belt [End Page 59] and generates a whole new set of questions on when and by what route the First Americans arrived in the "New World." For readers unfamiliar with the history of First American science and Native American creation myths, this book is a good starting point. Davis is to be commended for taking on such a thorny issue. It brings to the forefront the Native American position of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.011
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreat Plains researchSame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207