MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377203699 · doi:10.1353/cye.2017.0017

Forms of Capital in the Process of School Ground Greening

2017· article· en· W4377203699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miho Lowan-Trudeau

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren Youth and Environments · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Green Space and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreeningProcess (computing)Social capitalCommon groundHuman capitalCapital (architecture)Grounded theoryCultural capitalPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyEconomic growthGeographySocial scienceQualitative researchSocial psychologyEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This constructivist grounded theory study takes a socio-critical approach to the process of school ground greening by examining how people in a western Canadian urban center manipulated forms of capital to initiate and maintain school ground greening projects. Key findings from the study include how social capital played a significant role in participants' ability to successfully initiate school ground greening projects, and that there were gains both in and from social capital during the process. Participants' experiences illustrated how forms of cultural, human, and economic capital were accessed, used, and/or gained during the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsSame topicUrban Green Space and HealthFrench-language works237,207