MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377203828 · doi:10.1353/cye.2014.0034

The Architecture of Childhood: Children, Modern Architecture and Reconstruction in Postwar England by Roy Kozlovsky

2014· article· en· W4377203828 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stanley H. King

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren Youth and Environments · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitecturePublishingTheme (computing)Government (linguistics)DocumentationHistorySociologyMedia studiesLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 2014 Children, Youth and Environments Children, Youth and Environments 24(2), 2014 The Architecture of Childhood: Children, Modern Architecture and Reconstruction in Postwar England Roy Kozlovsky (2013). Ashgate Studies in Architecture Series Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 279 pages. $109.95 USD (hardback). ISBN: 978-1-4094-3977-6. Roy Kozlovsky casts his academic eye back in time to an England struggling to recover from war. His comments draw from his rigorous search of writings and buildings produced from 1935 to 1959, threading them along a theme of childhood. His is a period I entered as an English child of 7 and left in 1959 to live in Canada as a father of a young family. Recollections of my life during those times in England bring to mind how government actions affected me as a child. My memories sometimes seem to contradict Kozlovsky, but appear now as shafts of sunlight in his documentation of disasters. He begins when war clouds darkened, and people foresaw social instability and began to prepare for recovery. They focused on youth, the sector of society most governed by the state. Kozlovsky sees in these years the most intensive discourse ever between government, architecture, and sociology over the care of children. The child brought planners a new regard for the user, and a focus on the effects of architecture on everyday life and its behavioral settings of light, textures, sound, and comfort. Children Must Speak for Themselves In the “The Peckham Experiment” in 1935, Kozlovsky describes a diagnostic center for family health, and research into children’s behavior, that formed a “common characteristic—children must speak for themselves….” Necessary and normal for medical diagnostic, but unheard of in planning, Peckham introduces an interesting counterpoint that Kozlovsky poses throughout his book between the planner who dictates to the user and the planner who listens to the user. When war and bombing began, frantic evacuation sent children to safety in the country. Into my own country-dwelling family came a teenaged girl, daughter of a London teacher, sent to us by local organizers because my father was a teacher. A pleasant time of friendship grew, and then multiplied when a whole school of boys and their teachers from London arrived and settled into old army barracks and a large mansion beside our school, with the principal and his wife coming to live with us in our large house. A year of delight followed for us all, particularly for the London boys and the girls in our co-ed school. Kozlovsky refers occasionally to the Book Review: The Architecture of Childhood: Children, Modern Architecture… 248 evacuation as traumatic, and recounts an aftermath of doubts on government wisdom. Surveys of “what children say” began to be circulated, and children’s voices began to be heeded. The voice of the user grew louder. Kozlovsky describes architect Max Lock’s 1947 project, “The Middleborough Experiment,” as “opening his planning process to the participation of the populous, including children, who helped in carrying out the preliminary survey. Participation and active citizenship were regarded as a measure to reduce political instability.” Adventure Playground Wartime boyhood in the country for my brother and I and our friends ran tirelessly in a life full of variety. All keen Boy Scouts, we had a code and self-imposed discipline. Kozlovsky describes how city governments, plagued with post-war juvenile delinquency, observed that children behaved well when actively and constructively engaged. Cities appointed leaders to supervise Adventure Playgrounds at bombed sites that were “chosen by children themselves... a place of their own where they could find materials for games of their own invention.” As in the Peckham Experiment, the Adventure Playground offered researchers ample material for study. Leadership, lightly applied, permitted anarchy to develop as a prelude to the youth imposing self-discipline. Kozlovsky returns often to the role of government in reconstructing England and its overall aim of healing its wounded society. School Design Kozlovsky describes a period of school building, with designs based on children’s observed actions and behavioral settings that supported their activities. Researchers watched children’s activities and measured the children’s perceptual sensitivity to the quality of light, color, textures, sound and comfortable...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsSame topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207