MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377221148 · doi:10.3171/case23129

Pneumorrhachis and pneumocephalus resulting from pneumothorax: illustrative case

2023· article· en· W4377221148 on OpenAlexaff
Davaine Joel Ndongo Sonfack, Bilal Tarabay, Jesse Shen, Zhi Wang, Ghassan Boubez, Daniel Shédid, Sung-Joo Yuh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Case Lessons · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumocephalusPneumothoraxSurgeryHeadachesEpidural spaceComplicationSpinal canalAsymptomaticRadiological weaponRadiologySpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pneumorrhachis and pneumocephalus are rare conditions in which air is found within the spinal canal and brain, respectively. It is mostly asymptomatic and can be located in the intradural or extradural space. Intradural pneumorrhachis should prompt clinicians to search and treat any underlying injury of the skull, chest, or spinal column. OBSERVATIONS: A 68-year-old man presented with a history of cardiopulmonary arrest together with pneumorrhachis and pneumocephalus following a recurrent pneumothorax. The patient reported acute headaches with no other neurological symptoms. He was managed conservatively with bed rest for 48 hours following thoracoscopic talcage of his pneumothorax. Follow-up imaging showed regression of the pneumorrhachis, and the patient reported no other neurological symptoms. LESSONS: Pneumorrhachis is an incidental radiological finding that self-resolves with conservative management. However, it can be a complication resulting from a serious injury. Therefore, close monitoring of neurological symptoms and complete investigations should be performed in patients with pneumorrhachis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery Case LessonsSame topicPneumothorax, Barotrauma, EmphysemaFrench-language works237,207