MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377223780 · doi:10.7566/jpscp.38.011065

Self-consistent Study of Non-Abelian Topological Superconductivity in Quasicrystals

2023· article· en· W4377223780 on OpenAlexafffund
Masahiro Hori, Rasoul Ghadimi, Takanori Sugimoto, Takami Tohyama, К. Tanaka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuasicrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsQuasicrystalSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsAbelian groupTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsMathematicsPure mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quasicrystals are emerging topological materials which defy all the laws of crystallography, with aperiodic long-range order and higher-dimensional symmetry.We study topological superconductivity (TSC) with broken time-reversal symmetry in prototypal two-dimensional quasicrystals, Penrose and Ammann-Beenker quasicrystals.By solving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations self-consistently for the mean fields, we show the stable occurrence of TSC in both Penrose and Ammann-Beenker quasicrystals.The topological nature of TSC in a quasicrystal is signified by the Bott index.We confirm the appearance of zero-energy Majorana fermions at surface boundaries when the Bott index is unity, in accordance with the bulk-boundary correspondence and the non-Abelian character of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuasicrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207