MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377231547 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3278884

A Performance and Reliability-Guaranteed Predictive Approach to Service Migration Path Selection in Mobile Computing

2023· article· en· W4377231547 on OpenAlexaff
Yong Ma, Mengxuan Dai, Shiyun Shao, Yunni Xia, Fan Li, Yulong Shen, Jianqi Li, Yin Li, Hemeng Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersJiangxi Normal University
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingReliability (semiconductor)Computer networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionNode (physics)Distributed computingProvisioningServerEdge computingMobile edge computingPath (computing)Service (business)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile edge computing (MEC) is a forward-looking technology that provides services through resources to meet the needs of cloud-edge Internet of Things (IoT) devices. It provides computing and storage data facilities for IoT users and further renders services through resources in vicinity to fulfill the needs from IoT devices at the cloud edge. However, a major difficulty in guaranteeing reliable resource provisioning is mobility, which brings in chances of service migrations among difference distributed edge nodes and thus causes potential risks of service failures or disruptions. Existing solutions in this direction can be ineffective since they tend to consider that stability of inter-edge-node data transmission to be irrelevant to user mobility and are thus in lack of a comprehensive model for estimating effectiveness of migration paths selected. In this article, instead, we consider that the effectiveness of migrations paths to be selected are highly dependent on user mobility as well as inter-edge-node stability propose a novel predictive and mobile track-aware approach to fault-tolerant service migration path selection in MEC (PTSM). It is capable of exploiting uses trajectories for accurate predictions of future tracks and selecting target servers as well as migration paths with guaranteed migration reliability and performance in terms of multiple metrics. We demonstrate with extensive simulations and numerical results that our proposed method outperforms its peers in terms of migration reliability and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207