Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows with elevated milk β-hydroxybutyrate levels during first 6 weeks of lactation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although there is evidence that ketosis negatively affects fertility, the effect of late and early ketosis on the reproductive performance of lactating cows has not been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between time and amplitude of elevated milk BHB (EMB) occurring within 42 d in milk (DIM) and subsequent reproductive performance of lactating Holstein cows. The dairy herd information data of 30,413 cows with 2 test-day milk BHB recordings during early lactation periods 1 and 2 (5-14 and 15-42 DIM, respectively) assessed as negative (<0.15 mmol/L), suspect (0.15-0.19 mmol/L), or positive (≥0.2 mmol/L) for EMB were used in this study. Based on the time and amplitude of milk BHB, cows were grouped into 7 groups: (1) healthy cows negative in both periods 1 and 2 were classified as NEG; (2) suspect in period 1 and negative in period 2: EARLY_SUSP; (3) suspect in period 1 and suspect/positive in period 2: EARLY_SUSP_Pro; (4) positive in period 1 and negative in period 2: EARLY_POS; (5) positive in period 1 and suspect/positive in period 2: EARLY_POS_Pro; (6) negative in period 1 and suspect in period 2: LATE_SUSP; and (7) negative in period 1 and positive in period 2: LATE_POS. The overall prevalence of EMB within 42 DIM was 27.4%, with the highest prevalence being EARLY_SUSP (10.49%). Cows in EARLY_POS and EARLY_POS_Pro, but not other EMB categories, had a longer interval from calving to first service compared with NEG cows. For the reproductive parameters, first service to conception interval, days open and calving interval, cows in all EMB groups except EARLY_SUSP had longer intervals compared with NEG cows. These data indicate that there is a negative association between EMB within 42 d and reproductive performance after the voluntary waiting period. The intriguing findings of this study are the unaltered reproductive performance of EARLY_SUSP cows, and the negative association between late EMB and reproductive performance. Hence, monitoring and prevention of ketosis during the first 6 wk of lactation is necessary to optimize reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".