MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Burnout and c-reactive protein levels: an integrative literature review

2023· article· en· W4377232577 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Paulista de Enfermagem · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Burnout
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCINAHLScopusBurnoutPortugueseLatin AmericansMedicineCochrane LibraryScientific literatureMEDLINEGerontologyAlternative medicinePsychologyFamily medicineNursingClinical psychologyPolitical sciencePsychological interventionPathologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To identify the scientific evidence available in the literature on the association between Burnout Syndrome (BS) and C-reactive protein levels. Methods This is an integrative literature review of articles published in Portuguese, Spanish and English, with no date limit, with different study designs, available electronically in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (PubMed), Scopus, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (LILACS), Science Direct, [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it