PP26.001 Development of a website using a co-design approach to promote uptake of advance care planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background In Alberta, the advance care planning (ACP) digital space would benefit from improvement in ease of navigation, simplified messaging, and use of lay language. Current literature supports encouraging individuals to begin ACP early in their life. There are opportunities to encourage this by bundling ACP with other life planning activities, such as financial and estate planning. Our objective was to develop an innovative and comprehensive Alberta-specific website that houses ACP and related life planning content and resources for the public. Methods The principles of co-design guided the development and implementation of our website. To develop ACP content, we assembled a multidisciplinary working group consisting of members of the public; professionals from the healthcare, legal, and financial sectors; policymakers; researchers; and representatives of community organizations. The structure of the website was co-designed by software developers, a marketing strategist, a communication advisor, and a graphic designer. Usability testing was conducted by a public panel of 13 individuals, representing end-users of diverse age, gender, race/ethnicity, and lived experience with ACP. Content analysis was used to thematize the feedback. Results CompassionateAlberta.ca was launched on October 1, 2022 to equip and empower the public to plan for their future care and take care of one another through aging, illness, and death. Topic areas of the website include health, financial and estate planning, accompanied by a curated list of resources relevant to Albertans. Storytelling was used throughout the website to reflect diverse situations where life planning is important. Usability testing resulted in a series of recommendation to improve understandability, navigation, actionability and inclusive language. Conclusion CompassionateAlberta.ca and the accompanying resources were co-designed to be a primary digital space for Albertans to access advance care planning and related content. Next steps include developing creative content and implementing this website broadly in collaboration with local community organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".