MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377241487 · doi:10.56687/9781447364825-009

Technology and care in Canada

2023· book-chapter· en· W4377241487 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arlene Astell, Janet Fast

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealthcare innovation and challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social care: policy, debates and evidence Structure of social careCanada's population of 38,526,760 people (Statistics Canada, 2022) is spread across 3,855,103 square miles in the second largest country in the world.The country comprises ten provinces and three territories, which share power with the federal government.Each province and territory elects its own government to create laws on public education, health and social services.The geography of the country and the distribution of centres of population contribute to a unique landscape in which care at home is delivered.Against this backdrop, Canada has no national social care 'system' per se.The Canada Health Act, adopted in 1984, is federal legislation that established criteria and conditions for insured healthcare services and extended healthcare services, which the provinces and territories must provide to receive the full Canada Health Transfer (CHT).CHT is a federal cash contribution to the cost of providing health services (delivery of which is the responsibility of the provinces and territories).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolicy Press eBooksSame topicHealthcare innovation and challengesFrench-language works237,207