MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377244946 · doi:10.1017/jpr.2023.19

A first-passage-place problem for integrated diffusion processes

2023· article· en· W4377244946 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Probability · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaplace transformMathematicsCombinatoricsDiffusion processFunction (biology)DiffusionQuadrant (abdomen)Moment-generating functionMoment (physics)Mathematical analysisRandom variablePhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let ${\mathrm{d}} X(t) = -Y(t) \, {\mathrm{d}} t$ , where Y ( t ) is a one-dimensional diffusion process, and let $\tau(x,y)$ be the first time the process ( X ( t ), Y ( t )), starting from ( x , y ), leaves a subset of the first quadrant. The problem of computing the probability $p(x,y)\,:\!=\, \mathbb{P}[X(\tau(x,y))=0]$ is considered. The Laplace transform of the function p ( x , y ) is obtained in important particular cases, and it is shown that the transform can at least be inverted numerically. Explicit expressions for the Laplace transform of $\mathbb{E}[\tau(x,y)]$ and of the moment-generating function of $\tau(x,y)$ can also be derived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied ProbabilitySame topicStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsFrench-language works237,207