MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377245811 · doi:10.1515/crelle-2023-0028

Geodesic nets on non-compact Riemannian manifolds

2023· article· en· W4377245811 on OpenAlexafffund
Gregory R. Chambers, Yevgeny Liokumovich, Alexander Nabutovsky, Regina Rotman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeodesicGeodesic mapMathematicsTangent vectorRiemannian manifoldSolving the geodesic equationsManifold (fluid mechanics)Unit tangent bundlePure mathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysisTangentTangent spaceCombinatoricsGeometryTangent bundle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A geodesic flower is a finite collection of geodesic loops based at the same point 𝑝 that satisfy the following balancing condition: the sum of all unit tangent vectors to all geodesic arcs meeting at 𝑝 is equal to the zero vector. In particular, a geodesic flower is a stationary geodesic net. We prove that, in every complete non-compact manifold with locally convex ends, there exists a non-trivial geodesic flower.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal)Same topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207