MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377263730 · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101415

Assessment of the potential impacts of climate changes on Syr Darya watershed: A hybrid ensemble analysis method

2023· article· en· W4377263730 on OpenAlexaff
Yongping Li, Hao Wang, Guohe Huang, Yanfeng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrology Regional Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStreamflowWatershedClimate changePrecipitationEnvironmental scienceClimatologyWater resourcesWater balanceDownscalingHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinGeographyMeteorologyGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syr Darya watershed, Central Asia. Climate change has the potential to significantly impact the precipitation patterns, available water resources, food security, and ecosystem balance of a watershed. However, limited understanding exists of the temperature, precipitation, and streamflow trends in the Syr Darya watershed under the influence of climate change due to the uncertainties associated with climate change and the incompleteness of observational data. In this study, a multi-GCMs based statistical ensemble analysis (MGSEA) method is developed to effectively reflect the uncertainty of climate predictions and comprehensively assess the impact of climate change on the Syr Darya watershed during the period from 2021 to 2100. New hydrological insights for the region: The variations in temperature, precipitation, and streamflow were assessed by analyzing the projection results of various scenario combinations. Compared to the baseline (1960–2005), the findings reveal a rise in the annual average temperature ranging from 0.2 to 3.8 ℃ for RCP 4.5 and from 1.4 to 5.5 ℃ for RCP 8.5 in the 2080s. Additionally, the research confirms a downward trend in annual precipitation, with decreases of 3.7–27.8% for RCP 4.5 and 5.1–47.7% for RCP 8.5. The results of streamflow analysis exhibit an increasing trend during winter and autumn and a decreasing trend during summer and spring. The research outcomes obtained from MGSEA can be utilized for supporting water resources planning and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrology Regional StudiesSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207