Mass Cytometry reveals unique phenotypic patterns associated with subclonal diversity and outcomes in multiple myeloma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable plasma cell (PC) malignancy. Although it is known that MM tumor cells display extensive intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, an integrated map of the tumor proteomic landscape has not been comprehensively evaluated. We evaluated 49 primary tumor samples from newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM patients by mass cytometry (CyTOF) using 34 antibody targets to characterize the integrated landscape of single-cell cell surface and intracellular signaling proteins. We identified 13 phenotypic meta-clusters across all samples. The abundance of each phenotypic meta-cluster was compared to patient age, sex, treatment response, tumor genetic abnormalities and overall survival. Relative abundance of several of these phenotypic meta-clusters were associated with disease subtypes and clinical behavior. Increased abundance of phenotypic meta-cluster 1, characterized by elevated CD45 and reduced BCL-2 expression, was significantly associated with a favorable treatment response and improved overall survival independent of tumor genetic abnormalities or patient demographic variables. We validated this association using an unrelated gene expression dataset. This study represents the first, large-scale, single-cell protein atlas of primary MM tumors and demonstrates that subclonal protein profiling may be an important determinant of clinical behavior and outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".