High-resolution multi-z confocal microscopy with a diffractive optical element
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been recent interest in the development of fluorescence microscopes that provide high-speed volumetric imaging for life-science applications. For example, multi-z confocal microscopy enables simultaneous optically-sectioned imaging at multiple depths over relatively large fields of view. However, to date, multi-z microscopy has been hampered by limited spatial resolution owing to its initial design. Here we present a variant of multi-z microscopy that recovers the full spatial resolution of a conventional confocal microscope while retaining the simplicity and ease of use of our initial design. By introducing a diffractive optical element in the illumination path of our microscope, we engineer the excitation beam into multiple tightly focused spots that are conjugated to axially distributed confocal pinholes. We discuss the performance of this multi-z microscope in terms of resolution and detectability and demonstrate its versatility by performing in-vivo imaging of beating cardiomyocytes in engineered heart tissues and neuronal activity in c. elegans and zebrafish brains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".