MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377288913 · doi:10.35297/qjae.010152

Publication Activity in Austrian Journals, 2011–20

2023· article· en· W4377288913 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Robert F. Mulligan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Institutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillConnaught FundUniversity of TorontoVictoria UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of SouthamptonUniversity of Nebraska OmahaSyddansk UniversitetUniversity of LeicesterUniversity of the Fraser ValleyUniversität St. GallenUniversity of Nevada, RenoUniversity of Technology SydneyUniversity of Texas at El PasoUniversity of OttawaUniversity of West GeorgiaUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of Notre DameUppsala UniversitetUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of MinnesotaUniversitetet i OsloUniversity of MiamiUniversity of MissouriUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsAustrian SchoolJournal rankingSchools of economic thoughtEconomicsPositive economicsMainstreamProductivitySocial sciencePolitical scienceSociologyNeoclassical economicsEconomic growthLawCitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Counts of publications in the academic journals of the Austrian school of economics are used to rank scholars and institutions by research productivity in Austrian economics over the preceding decade. The journals surveyed are, alphabetically, Advances in Austrian Economics, Cosmos + Taxis, the Journal des économistes et des études humaines, the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, and the Review of Austrian Economics. Ranking methodology follows the established mainstream literature but focuses on publications in journals that specialize in the Austrian school. An appraisal of the Austrian school’s progress over the past decade is provided, and implications for the future are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Quarterly Journal of Austrian EconomicsSame topicEconomic Theory and InstitutionsFrench-language works237,207