MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377693443 · doi:10.1353/cye.2011.0017

Asphalt to Ecosystems: Design Ideas for Schoolyard Transformation

2011· article· en· W4377693443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Illène Pevec

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren Youth and Environments · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityNatural (archaeology)SociologyCreativityGeographyPedagogyEnvironmental ethicsEcologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

437 Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 21 No. 2 (Winter 2011) ISSN: 1546-2250 Asphalt to Ecosystems: Design Ideas for Schoolyard Transformation Danks, Sharon (2010). Oakland, CA: New Village Press; 288 pages. $39.95. ISBN 0976605481. “At the heart of the ecological schooyard philosophy is the concept of raising children to become land stewards” (243). Sharon Danks has given us brilliantly illustrated examples of this philosophy in action in schoolyards around the world in her stunning book, Asphalt to Ecosystems. I cannot remember any book that has made me long so much to return to age seven, to magically enter a book’s photographs and to try out the many natural, creative play and learning spaces that Danks documents. Her professional knowledge as an environmental planner working with school communities to design and build naturalized play and educational spaces makes this work a true tool for anyone wishing to inspire local schools to become places where school grounds reflect a living sustainability ethic. Danks opens with the reasons that schoolyards need to be places for creative engagement with the natural world for children and youth of all ages. Whether they are toddlers smelling the lavender, elementary aged children growing a vegetable garden to enhance their snack and lunch time, or teens creating a natural woodlands and wetlands for their high school science and art classes, these activities educate and engage children in caring for nature while they play and learn. We did not evolve with asphalt but with biological diversity, and nature is our natural habitat. The many colorful photos on every page reflect the ways various countries embody their own perceptions of nature and how children can interact with it. The Scandinavian countries do not have the litigious society of North America, and therefore their schoolyards include small forests, streams, and waterfalls where children can climb trees and make little dams. Child-made public art glows with life in many North American and British school yards where children 438 collaborate with local artists to tile benches, paint murals and weave willows into fences and arches for their school gardens. In Japan, mini rice paddies with traditional bridges grace elementary schoolyards. Cultural identity finds expression in art and garden traditions in each country represented. Danks not only addresses schoolyards, but also energy and design issues in school buildings: adequate natural light, renewable energy, water conservation and even design for water purification and reuse . Children in such environments learn a whole-system understanding of healthy ecosystems. This book will inspire children, teachers, parents, architects and landscape architects to brainstorm what they want for their schools. Danks emphasizes the importance of participatory planning processes to support long-term stewardship—and wisely uses the word stewardship, rather than maintenance, for the approach to caring for these beautiful sites once they exist. The only piece missing from this useful book is how to create school policy supporting sustainability education in states or provinces that lack a philosophy integrating outdoor learning, buildings and landscape design with curricular and health goals. Perhaps Delaine Eastin, California’s Director of Education, in successfully passing legislation requiring and funding school gardens, would write a “How to Create Sustainability Policies for Schools” guide. Asphalt to Ecosystems belongs on every school superintendent’s and every state board of education director’s desk so that all children can have the chance to experience learning and playing in dynamic, living environments that inspire them to life-long stewardship. Reviewer Information Pevec Illène Illène Pevec has been working with all ages of young people in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil to develop gardens since 1998. Her research into how gardening impacts young people has been concurrent. She recently completed her doctoral degree at the University of Colorado Denver with research into adolescent' gardeners' experiences. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsSame topicIndigenous and Place-Based EducationFrench-language works237,207