Dual UHPLC-HRMS Metabolomics and Lipidomics and Automated Data Processing Workflow for Comprehensive High-Throughput Gut Phenotyping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, feces has surfaced as the matrix of choice for investigating the gut microbiome-health axis because of its non-invasive sampling and the unique reflection it offers of an individual’s lifestyle. In cohort studies where the number of samples required is large, but availability is scarce, a clear need exists for high-throughput analyses. Such analyses should combine a wide physicochemical range of molecules with a minimal amount of sample and resources and downstream data processing workflows that are as automated and time efficient as possible. We present a dual fecal extraction and ultra high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution-quadrupole-orbitrap-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-Q-Orbitrap-MS)-based workflow that enables widely targeted and untargeted metabolome and lipidome analysis. A total of 836 in-house standards were analyzed, of which 360 metabolites and 132 lipids were consequently detected in feces. Their targeted profiling was validated successfully with respect to repeatability (78% CV < 20%), reproducibility (82% CV < 20%), and linearity (81% R 2 > 0.9), while also enabling holistic untargeted fingerprinting (15,319 features, CV < 30%). To automate targeted processing, we optimized an R-based targeted peak extraction (TaPEx) algorithm relying on a database comprising retention time and mass-to-charge ratio (360 metabolites and 132 lipids), with batch-specific quality control curation. The latter was benchmarked toward vendor-specific targeted and untargeted software and our isotopologue parameter optimization/XCMS-based untargeted pipeline in LifeLines Deep cohort samples ( n = 97). TaPEx clearly outperformed the untargeted approaches (81.3 vs 56.7–66.0% compounds detected). Finally, our novel dual fecal metabolomics–lipidomics–TaPEx method was successfully applied to Flemish Gut Flora Project cohort ( n = 292) samples, leading to a sample-to-result time reduction of 60%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".