Dietary thiaminase impairs cardiac function and increases heart size in lake trout (<i>Salvelinus namaycush</i> (Walbaum in Artedi, 1792))
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The consumption of invasive, high-thiaminase prey fishes can cause thiamine deficiency, which has been hypothesized to be a major barrier for lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush (Walbaum in Artedi, 1792)) restoration in the Great Lakes. In fishes, an understudied aspect of thiamine deficiency is its effect on cardiac function, despite evidence of this effect in mammals. Here, parr of two strains of lake trout (Seneca and Slate) were raised on either a control or high-thiaminase diet for nine months. We then measured cardiac function and morphology, particularly as it relates to the ability of the heart to meet oxygen demands at warmer water temperatures. The thiaminase diet was associated with significant heart enlargement and reduced cardiac performance at high temperatures. These effects were observed in both strains but were more pronounced in Slate strain fish. Our data suggest that dietary thiaminase impairs cardiac function in fishes and that these impairments may become increasingly important as water temperatures increase through climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".