MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377694373 · doi:10.1353/cye.2018.0002

The Rise of Adventure Play Provision in North America

2018· article· en· W4377694373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joan Almon, Rusty Keeler

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren Youth and Environments · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOutdoor and Experiential Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureSpace (punctuation)Adventure educationPublic relationsPolitical sciencePsychologyHistoryComputer scienceArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Play provision, which includes time and space for play, is making a comeback in the U.S. and Canada after several decades of serious decline. One indicator is the formation of six new adventure playgrounds in the U.S. in the past five years. They follow the tradition of such playgrounds in the U.K. and provide children with abundant loose parts for play and trained staff who support children's play without directing it. Loose parts and trained play staff are also finding their way into schoolyards and summer camps. The North American Adventure Play Association (NAAPA) is developing workshops and trainings for play staff, and providing an avenue for play advocates to seek out and help one another. Play provision in general, and especially play rich in adventure and risk, is on the rise again.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsSame topicOutdoor and Experiential EducationFrench-language works237,207