MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377824314 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-hvs2p

A Variant on the CREST Algorithm for Non-Covalent Clusters of Flexible Molecules

2023· preprint· en· W4377824314 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathanael J. King, Ian LeBlanc, Alex Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsMacEwan UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyNational Research Council CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsConformational isomerismCrestCovalent bondMoleculeAlgorithmChemistryComputational chemistryWork (physics)Computer sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conformational ensemble generation and the search for the global minimum con- formation are important problems in computational chemistry. In this work, a variant on the Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool (CREST) algorithm designed for determining structural ensembles and energetics of non-covalent clusters of flexible molecules is presented. As with CREST, the energies are evaluated using the semiem- pirical GFN2-xtb extended tight binding approach. The utility of the algorithm is highlighted using dimers and trimers of model asphaltene compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207