MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377832589 · doi:10.18280/ts.400209

Large-Scale Civil Engineering Structure Deformation Monitoring Research Based on Image Recognition

2023· article· en· W4377832589 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaodong Yan, Xiaogang Song

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeformation monitoringScale (ratio)Artificial intelligenceDeformation (meteorology)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionCartographyGeographyMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale civil engineering structures may experience deformations during construction and use due to various reasons, affecting the safety and service life of the structures.The application of image recognition technology in the field of civil engineering has promoted the research and development of related technologies, providing new technical means for the monitoring and evaluation of civil engineering structures.Existing image recognition methods may be affected by factors such as lighting, occlusion, and image quality when dealing with large-scale civil engineering structure deformation monitoring, resulting in reduced recognition accuracy.Therefore, this study conducts research on large-scale civil engineering structure deformation monitoring based on image recognition.Traditional civil engineering structure deformation detection methods are presented.A simple and intuitive curve expression is used to describe the deformation characteristics of civil engineering structures, and GCN is used to mine the feature information between adjacent feature points and long-distance related points to improve prediction performance.A graph convolution prediction module and a geometric auxiliary prediction module are set up for the constructed prediction model, and the setting objectives and structural principles of the two modules are explained.In response to the challenges of extracting large-scale civil engineering structure deformation curves, an automatic extraction method based on deep learning networks is proposed, achieving high-precision recognition and extraction of civil engineering structure deformation curves.Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207