Automated Classification of Brain Tumor Disease with a Novel CNN Relief and SVM-Based Deep Hybrid Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The brain tumor is a very dangerous type of cancer that can be seen in people of almost any age and usually results in the patient's death.Early detection of these tumors, which have many varieties, is extremely important in terms of the patient's survival, affecting the planning of treatment, just as with other types of cancer.Early diagnosis of the disease is usually performed by means of imaging devices.It takes a lot of expertise to analyze the MRI images and diagnose the brain tumor.In this study, a hybrid deep model is recommended that can be used effectively in the classification of the brain tumor.The proposed hybrid model is a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based method that automatically classifies Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of three different types of brain tumors, Glioma, Meningioma and Pituitary successfully.Our model is basically going through these stages.First of all, the features from the two models that show the highest performance from pre-trained deep models are combined.The most effective features of the specification map obtained in the next phase were selected using the Relief method.At the last stage, classification was carried out with Support Vector Machine (SVM), one of the most known machine learning techniques.As a result of the experiments, the hybrid deep model we proposed obtained 93.2% accuracy.It seems that proposed hybrid method has very competitive results and is thought to be efficiently used to classify the brain tumor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".