MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377832625 · doi:10.18280/ts.400223

Human Face and Facial Expression Recognition Using Deep Learning and SNet Architecture Integrated with BottleNeck Attention Module

2023· article· en· W4377832625 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckFacial expression recognitionArchitectureFace (sociological concept)Artificial intelligenceDeep learningComputer scienceExpression (computer science)Facial recognition systemFacial expressionComputer architecturePattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionEmbedded systemArtVisual artsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal infrared face image recognition with the help of deep learning technology has become the most debated concept in research area nowadays.Many articles are done and being working on this area to discover novel findings.Thermal infrared images can be recognised irrespective of light conditions, aging and facial disguises.This paper proposes a method named SNet integrated with BottleNeck Attention Module (SN-BNAM) for thermal face image recognition using SENet architecture in which the BottleNeck Attention Module is integrated.After squeeze and excitation process, the channel and spatial attention is inferred as two separate branches inside the BottleNeck Attention Module (BAM).This module is placed at each BottleNeck area.The SN-BNAM module can be integrated with any feed forward convolutional neural networks.The efficiency of the proposed system is evaluated by experimenting on various architectures and object validation is done on VOC 2007, MS COCO, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet-1K datasets.These experiments proves that our method shows consistent improvement in image classification and object detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it