MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377832635 · doi:10.18280/ts.400220

Master-Slave Convolutional Deep Architecture for Vehicle Identification and Type Classification

2023· article· en· W4377832635 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bencheriet Chemesse Ennehar, Bencheriet Samra

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Thématique de Recherche en Science et Technologie
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArchitectureDeep learningArtificial intelligenceIntelligent transportation systemReduction (mathematics)Identification (biology)Real-time computingSimilarity (geometry)Artificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringImage (mathematics)Transport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video surveillance of road traffic plays an important role in highway safety and is an important application of intelligent transportation systems.One of the basic applications of intelligent transport systems is the detection and classification of vehicle types.The major problems encountered by these systems are the significant similarity between the vehicles, frequent occlusions on the highway, and low resolution of the surveillance cameras.This paper proposes a novel convolutional neural network architecture called master-slave convolutional deep architecture for vehicle detection and type classification.The basic concept of this architecture is twofold: a.The sequential operation of the two networks where the slave network only works if the master network detects vehicles in the road scene will allow a considerable reduction in the search area for vehicles.It will induce a significant reduction in processing time.b.A combination of deep-shallow neural networks allows the system to share the knowledge gained from the vehicles on two networks.The first (master) shallow learns the shape of vehicles while the second (slave) is responsible for learning all the details of vehicles to distinguish the different classes.The experimental results, performed on 3200 images, have shown that the favorable performance of the proposed CNN architecture allowed us to achieve successful detection with TPR of 92% and TNR of 95% and vehicle type classification with a considerable mean average precision of 93.38% where cars classification gives the highest rate (98.63%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207