Bioinformatics of cyanophycin metabolism genes and characterization of promiscuous isoaspartyl dipeptidases that catalyze the final step of cyanophycin degradation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyanophycin is a bacterial biopolymer used for storage of fixed nitrogen. It is composed of a backbone of L-aspartate residues with L-arginines attached to each of their side chains. Cyanophycin is produced by cyanophycin synthetase 1 (CphA1) using Arg, Asp and ATP, and is degraded in two steps. First, cyanophycinase breaks down the backbone peptide bonds, releasing β-Asp-Arg dipeptides. Then, these dipeptides are broken down into free Asp and Arg by enzymes with isoaspartyl dipeptidase activity. Two bacterial enzymes are known to possess promiscuous isoaspartyl dipeptidase activity: isoaspartyl dipeptidase (IadA) and isoaspartyl aminopeptidase (IaaA). We performed a bioinformatic analysis to investigate whether genes for cyanophycin metabolism enzymes cluster together or are spread around the microbial genomes. Many genomes showed incomplete contingents of known cyanophycin metabolizing genes, with different patterns in various bacterial clades. Cyanophycin synthetase and cyanophycinase are usually clustered together when recognizable genes for each are found within a genome. Cyanophycinase and isoaspartyl dipeptidase genes typically cluster within genomes lacking cphA1. About one-third of genomes with genes for CphA1, cyanophycinase and IaaA show these genes clustered together, while the proportion is around one-sixth for CphA1, cyanophycinase and IadA. We used X-ray crystallography and biochemical studies to characterize an IadA and an IaaA from two such clusters, in Leucothrix mucor and Roseivivax halodurans, respectively. The enzymes retained their promiscuous nature, showing that being associated with cyanophycin-related genes did not make them specific for β-Asp-Arg dipeptides derived from cyanophycin degradation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".