MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance Analysis of an Adaptive MPPT Control for a Grid-connected PV Solar System

2022· article· en· W4377964981 on OpenAlexaff
M. Nasir Uddin, Jeffrey Andrew-Cotter, Ifte Khairul Amin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingPhotovoltaic systemDuty cycleControl theory (sociology)Maximum power principleComputer scienceBoost converterGrid-connected photovoltaic power systemEngineeringElectronic engineeringVoltageInverterElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an adaptive maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control of a grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) energy conversion system utilizing neuro-fuzzy (NF) technique. The particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to train the membership functions while the recursive least squares algorithm is used to update the consequent parameters of the NF based MPPT scheme to cope with changing operating condition of PV solar system. The MPPT algorithm maximizes conversion efficiency by adjusting the duty cycle of the buck-boost converter to change the output voltage of the solar panel and hence, achieving the maximum panel output power for a given set of environmental conditions. The training data for NF scheme is obtained by operating the system using the perturb and observe (PO) MPPT algorithm. The performance of the proposed NF-based MPPT algorithm is validated in both simulation and real-time. The prototype PV system is built and the designed NF-based MPPT algorithm is implemented in laboratory environment using the DSP board DS1104. It is found that the proposed NF-based MPPT scheme achieves a very fast response with minor oscillations while transferring maximum power from solar panel to the grid line as compared to the conventional PO based MPPT scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207