MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377965995 · doi:10.1299/jsmefed.2022.os04-14

Experiments on natural convection in a horizontal slot with surface corrugation

2022· article· en· W4377965995 on OpenAlexaff
K. Tamano, Ayumu Inasawa, Mizuki INOKOSHI, J. M. Floryan

Bibliographic record

VenueRyuutai Kougaku Bumon Kouenkai kouen rombunshuu/Ryutai Kogaku Bumon Koenkai koen ronbunshu · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural convectionRayleigh numberConvectionWavelengthWavenumberRayleigh scatteringMechanicsRayleigh–Bénard convectionThermalConvection cellSurface (topology)AmplitudeMaterials scienceCombined forced and natural convectionOpticsGeologyGeometryMeteorologyPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to better understand how critically the small surface irregularity affects the formation of thermal convection, natural convection in a horizontal slot with surface corrugation was examined experimentally at Rayleigh number based on the slot half-height below 300. The sinusoidal surface corrugations whose amplitude was 2.5% of the slot full-height and wavenumber was 0.5 - 2 was applied on the bottom surface while upper surface was kept smooth. Both walls were heated uniformly at different temperature. The results showed that surface corrugation promoted the occurrence of thermal convection significantly, that is, a pair of convection rolls whose wavelength was the same as that of corrugation was observed at Rayleigh number much lower than the critical one of smooth slot. Beyond critical Rayleigh number, on the other hand, the Rayleigh-Benard convection dominated the flow regardless of corrugation wavelength examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRyuutai Kougaku Bumon Kouenkai kouen rombunshuu/Ryutai Kogaku Bumon Koenkai koen ronbunshuSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207