MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377967184 · doi:10.46254/na07.20220377

Troubleshooting the Deodoriser Unit in a Palm Oil Refinery

2023· article· en· W4377967184 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Automation and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKementerian Sains, Teknologi dan InovasiNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTroubleshootingPalm oilRefineryPalmComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringOperating systemAgroforestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the fuzzy expert system for troubleshooting the deodoriser in palm oil refinery plant. Interviews with experienced plant staffs and operators were conducted, and required information regarding the whole process were gathered for identifying the faults, defining the membership functions and providing a sequence of necessary actions. Industrial plant data were used to check the performance of the fuzzy expert system. It was found that the troubleshooting system is capable of predicting the failures and suggesting necessary actions with a similarity value of 80 percent with the system database. In addition, the proposed expert system is useful for operators' guidance and for field training purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it