MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377968636 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdad061.106

(110) Characterizing Sexuality and Assessing Predictors of Sexual Satisfaction in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

2023· article· en· W4377968636 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Henkelman, Kirsti Toivonen, Jason Tay, Sara Beattie, Lauren M. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual functionHuman sexualityMedicineClinical psychologyDistressPopulationSexual dysfunctionPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction There is a paucity of literature documenting cancer-related sexual concerns among patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Despite profound sexual changes being reported in other types of hematological cancer (i.e., lymphoma, leukemia), all types of hematological cancer patients tend to be grouped together, potentially overlooking the unique concerns of patients with MM. Objective This study is the first to characterize sexuality uniquely in the MM population, and to examine predictors of sexual satisfaction for MM, comparatively with participants with other hematological cancer types. Methods We performed a mixed modality self-report survey of patients with hematological cancer, recruiting both in-person and online. Men and women with MM (N=89) and other hematological cancers (N=84) participated in our survey. The survey included demographics and health information, as well as several quantitative sexuality measures including sexual distress, sexual function, sexual flexibility, sexual interest, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction. Results MM survivors exhibited poor sexual function but low sexual distress, and endorsed mid-high scores on measures of sexual interest, sexual flexibility, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction. Results indicate that for MM and other hematological cancer survivors, lower sexual distress and higher sexual communication were associated with higher sexual satisfaction (b = .428, p < .001; b = -.299, p = .001) while sexual flexibility, sexual interest, and sexual function did not explain significant variance in sexual satisfaction. Thematic analysis on open-ended questions indicates that potentially unique to MM, consequences of bone disease (i.e., bone pain, bone fracture, and spinal cord compression) affected sexual expression and resulted in reduced mobility impacting sexual activity, as well as painful sexual experiences, or anxiety relating to sex. Conclusions This study supported the need for sexual health interventions for those diagnosed with MM. Further, it demonstrated that sexual interventions that are used for other hematological cancer patients may be similarly effective for those with MM. Special consideration regarding the impact of bone disease on sexual expression in MM patients should be taken. Disclosure No

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207