MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robust Distributed MPC for Constrained Multi -Agent Systems against DoS Attacks

2022· article· en· W4377972213 on OpenAlexaff
Yufan Dai, Manyun Li, Kunwu Zhang, Yang Shi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDenial-of-service attackRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceMulti-agent systemNonlinear systemModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Distributed computingScheme (mathematics)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper investigates the formation stabilization problem of nonlinear multi-agent systems (MASs). Each agent of the MASs studied in this paper is subject to external disturbances and there also exist denial-of-service (DoS) attacks affecting the communication channels among agents. To tackle these issues, a robust distributed model predictive control (MPC) scheme is proposed, in which a novel strategy is developed to compensate for the missing state information from neighbors induced by the DoS attacks. As a result, the effect of DoS attacks can be mitigated by using the proposed control strategy. In the meantime, the influence of additive disturbances is alleviated by designing the robustness constraints in the proposed distributed MPC. Finally, the effectiveness of proposed scheme is verified by the numerical simulation result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207