MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fault Analysis of Microgrids with Inverter Interfaced Resources in Grid-Connected and Islanded Modes

2022· article· en· W4377972252 on OpenAlexaff
Jigyesh Sharma, Kushan Tharuka Lulbadda, Anindita Golder, T.S. Sidhu, Sheldon S. Williamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridInverterDistributed generationRenewable energyGridFault (geology)Wind powerPenetration (warfare)Computer scienceEnergy storagePhotovoltaic systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringReliability engineeringAutomotive engineeringVoltagePower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing penetration of inverter-based generation such as solar, wind and battery energy storage systems (BESS) has an impact on the fault currents in a microgrid. Also, if the microgrid is grid-connected or islanded affects the fault current. As such, it is important to conduct fault analysis of microgrids in grid-connected and islanded modes with different penetration levels of inverter-based generation sources to understand the impact of increasing levels of renewable energy on the fault currents. Different types of faults in a microgrid with inverter-based resources are simulated and the results are discussed and analyzed in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207