Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing demand for video streaming in all forms draws significant research and development attention, especially on the client-side for adaptive streaming services like DASH and HLS. However, the implementation challenges in developing and validating new client-side solutions within a full-stack video player pose a major obstacle. State-of-the-art open-source video players, such as DASH.js, VLC, and GPAC, were designed for specific purposes and are difficult to extend and modify for video streaming research. To address this issue, we propose iStream Player, a versatile video player framework featuring fully extendable and independent micro-modules similar to Lego blocks. Constructing a video player in iStream Player is as simple as assembling Lego pieces. Our case studies demonstrate that it is effortless to create a diverse range of players by making only minor changes, such as extending or replacing only one or two micro-modules. As a result, iStream Player significantly reduces the time and effort required to develop and validate new solutions, providing researchers and developers in the video streaming field with a shared platform to explore and to share their innovative ideas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".