MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377985489 · doi:10.56687/9781447366188-003

Introduction: framing and comparing unpaid care work

2023· book-chapter· en· W4377985489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pat Armstrong, Marta Szebehely

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraming (construction)Unpaid workCare workSociologyWork (physics)EngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter begins by defining nursing homes, before moving on to set out the feminist political economy theory that guides the research and the teams' multiple methods that provide the data for this book. It then explains what nursing homes look like in Canada, Sweden and Norway. These homes are located within the different normative frames dominant in these countries, with those values, along with other forces, used to help explain the different funding and ownership patterns. The chapter then turns to showing how these factors in turn shape the staffing and physical structures of nursing homes in the three countries. It ends with an explanation of how the various chapters explore the implications for the relatively unexplored unpaid work done by residents and staff, as well as for the more researched work of families and volunteers, revealing the forces that make boundaries flexible among the various forms of labour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolicy Press eBooksSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207