Gender-Specific Association Between Perceived Stigma Toward Tuberculosis and Acceptance of Preventive Treatment Among College Students With Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Cross-Sectional Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increasing enrollment scale of colleges, the number of students on campus has risen sharply in China. The number of students with tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin-resistant TB in colleges has increased significantly. Preventive treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an important means for TB prevention and control in colleges. At present, the acceptance of LTBI treatment among college students remains unclear. In addition, evidence shows stigma may be one of the key factors affecting acceptance of LTBI treatment. To date, there is little direct evidence on the gender-specific association between perceived stigma toward TB and acceptance of LTBI treatment among college students. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the acceptance of LTBI treatment among college students in an eastern province of China to explore the association between perceived stigma toward TB and acceptance of LTBI treatment and to examine the moderating effect of gender on the association. METHODS: Data were derived from the project on the evaluation of LTBI treatment and its effectiveness among college students in Shandong, China. In total, 1547 college students were included in the analysis. We considered covariates at the individual and family levels. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine the moderating role of gender and also explore the association between perceived stigma toward TB and acceptance of LTBI treatment. RESULTS: The acceptance rate of LTBI treatment among the diagnosed college students was 46.7% (n=723). The proportion of female students (n=361, 51.5%) accepting LTBI treatment was higher than that of male students (n=362, 42.8%; P=.001). There was an interaction between perceived stigma toward TB and gender (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-1.00; P=.06). Among college students with LTBI, perceived stigma toward TB was positively associated with acceptance of preventive treatment (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.08, P=.05). Perceived stigma toward TB was positively associated with accepting LTBI treatment only among male students (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12; P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: The acceptance rate of preventive treatment among college students with LTBI was low. Contrary to our expectations, perceived stigma toward TB was positively associated with acceptance of preventive treatment. Gender moderated this association; high perceived stigma toward TB was associated with acceptance of preventive treatment only in male gender. Gender-specific strategies are effective in improving the acceptability of LTBI treatment in colleges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".